Just able to run through it now... +1 from me.

Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> > You mean the code running after ap_process_connection() has returned?
> > Yes, that works for me. Here is a new patch:
> 
> make it so...  I don't see anybody else chiming in...
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to