Erik Abele wrote:
Therefore I sent the attached patch some days ago ;-)
Patch applied and that directory cvs up'd on daedalus. Thanks, Erik.
What I didn't do (and your patch didn't do either) is change the reference in README.html to a "small patch for a small problem" pointing to
apache_2.0.43-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip . I don't know for certain if that is relevant for .44, but there is a .44 patch with that naming convention, so maybe there is another small problem. Could someone who knows for sure what's going on here please do whatever is appropriate?
My patch didn't include it because it was already correct :-)
It said '...is called <code>apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip</code>' which is correct (the appropriate file is there, see also Joshua's commit -> r1.32).
Now it says: '...is called <code>apache_2.0.43-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip</code>' which is not correct IMHO, there is no file with such a name.
Find below another patch to get it finally right (also linked to the mentioned patch for clarity)...
cheers, Erik
Thanks, Greg
Index: README.html =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-dist/binaries/win32/README.html,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.33 README.html --- README.html 28 Feb 2003 17:13:27 -0000 1.33 +++ README.html 28 Feb 2003 20:35:35 -0000 @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ <p>Due to a small problem in this release, Win95/98/ME users must download, in addition to the regular distribution, a small patch file containing an updated <code>bin/libapr.dll</code> file. The file -is called <code>apache_2.0.43-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip</code> -and should be extracted from the root of your Apache installation.</p> - +is called <a href="apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip" +><code>apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip</code></a> and should be +extracted from the root of your Apache installation.</p>
<p>A full setup package (.exe) containing the Win9x/WinNT Microsoft System Installer installer is now available. If the Microsoft System Installer
