At 11:01 PM +0100 3/26/03, Andre Schild wrote:
>
>But currently we are at the stage that the SSLMutex passes a NULL
>filename in for the mutexname and assumes the apr will generate
>"something".
>

It's more correct to say that it assumes APR "does the right thing", which
it does. Under Win32 it creates an unnamed mutex ala the mpm.
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to