At 11:01 PM +0100 3/26/03, Andre Schild wrote: > >But currently we are at the stage that the SSLMutex passes a NULL >filename in for the mutexname and assumes the apr will generate >"something". >
It's more correct to say that it assumes APR "does the right thing", which it does. Under Win32 it creates an unnamed mutex ala the mpm. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson