At 01:36 PM 3/27/2003, Sander Striker wrote: >> From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Ok, so sander and I were just discussing the creation of an httpd-config >> script, analogous to apr-config etc, which apxs or module developers could >> just call at need. >> Apxs could then shed a lot of code and become a program specifically to >> build modules, rather than also having to be used to query build variables >> and the myriad of other stuff it currently does. > >Just chiming in... Currently we have a dependency on perl to figure out >stuff like include dirs etc, which is a bit silly. httpd-config could be >done as a shell script, removing that dependency.
WHOH! Go ahead, f* us win32 users ;-) Actually, Thom's point actually makes win32 much *easier* to set up to support APXs on win32... if we can only get rid of the libtool dependency ;-) In any case, I'm thinking if you want to create a parallel .sh script and we can all agree to keep the .sh and .pl flavors of apxs in working order, this could be a good thing for everyone :-) Bill
