William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > >Hmmm... Well, the reason we do it for the accept mutex lockfile is > >so when using the default setting, you can have multiple Apache instances > >on the same server and not worry about clobbering the lockfile. If > >we have a default lockfile for SSLMutex, then we should protect it. > >So we have something like logs/ssl_mutex?? > > Hmmm. Funny - because you must already make an effort to create > distinct access logs/error logs/pid file/shared dbm's. >
True enough... I think it's because some still put them in like /tmp/accept.lock -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
