> From: Andre Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:35 AM
>> At 06:27 PM 4/1/2003, you wrote: >>>* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> >>>But some issues anyway: >>>- Shouldn't the announcement point to httpd.apache.org/download.cgi? >> >> I though either is now an OK starting point, now that the specific downloads >> are always dispatched to a proxy. If I assumed wrong, sorry about that. > > Uhm, AFAICS they aren't if you're going directly via the /dist/httpd site. > download.cgi _is_ the dispatcher. You are correct. We can expect a hit on daedalus again... Anyhow, thanks to the people that made 2.0.45 happen. This one wasn't an easy ride. Sorry I didn't have the time to pitch in and help out. Hopefully I have some more time around the next release. Sander
