> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:39 PM
>>>3. use the API versioning which is present in httpd-2.0 (and later) to
>>> define two back-end interfaces for mod_dav. The current interface
>>> is v1, and the new "pool accepting" interface becomes v2. mod_dav
>>> is updated so that it can use either interface. mod_dav_svn is
>>> updated to supply both: the old wrapper-based form, and the new
>>> form. This will allow a mix/match between httpd-2.0.X (and 2.X.Y)
>>> and mod_dav_svn.
>>
>> I'm mostly asking, is this a real win?
>
> This is Greg Stein's department; I'm not familiar with the political
> implications of our various options. ("Do we make v1 and v2 provider
> interfaces available to the 2.0 branch? Or just declare that mod_dav
> has a new API in httpd-2.1?") I'll let him address this topic.
If we want to make use of it in Subversion, then it [the v2 provider API]
needs to be available in 2.0. Otherwise why would you bother fixing it? ;)
Sander
