* Andr? Malo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> * Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 12:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Modified: docs/manual Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH bind.html.en
> >> bind.html.ja.jis bind.html.ko.euc-kr
> >> cgi_path.html.en cgi_path.html.ja.jis
> >> cgi_path.html.ko.euc-kr configuring.html.en
> > [...]
> >
> > I've been trying to hold my tongue on this, but I can't any longer.
> > Is there something we can do about gigantic commits like this? This
> > commit generated a 660KB email! Nobody is reading these emails. I'm
> > already opposed to having automatically generated content committed
> > to CVS, but when I'm receiving gigantic emails like this it's too much.
+1
>
> Hmmmmm, sorry.
> I'd see some alternatives
> - split the commit (e.g. by language)
> - create a new docs-cvs-mailinglist
> - drop the generated files and build the stuff online and for every release
> (RM job, resp. the tarball roller's) - would need some MBs of Java stuff
> installed everywhere
> - ?
>
I'd go with dropping the generated files out of CVS altogether - I don't see
that there's much reason to keep them there, and a teeny wodge of java is
not exactly an odious proposition for most of us these days I'd think?
Cheers
-Thom
