Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Schaefer wrote: > > ap_http_filter seems to assume it will receive an empty brigade from its > > caller.
[...] > I think that assumptions is valid for all filters and is correct by (an > undocumented) design. I sure hope it's not by design, because an unsuspecting content-handler author who violates the (undocumented) assumption can segfault the server quite by accident. But if it is by design, *why* isn't there at least an assert(APR_BRIGADE_IS_EMPTY...) *anywhere* within the httpd-2.0 source tree? > If I understand things correctly, If you want to re-use some older bbs > (e.g. from previous invocations or if you have an underrun and ask for > more during the same invocation), you should create a new bb, pass it > to ap_get_brigade() and then merge with the previous one. Right, that's the situation. -- Joe Schaefer
