On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 05:55:10PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > I should point out that the above code does one thing that my code does > not: it allows for bucket e to be completely absent from ctx->b. (In > which case ctx->b would be left completely empty at the end of the loop.) > My code assumes that e is guaranteed to be somewhere in brigade ctx->b. > (In which case ctx->b will have at least one bucket (e) left in it at the > end of the loop.)
What would happen if e weren't there and it were passed to APR_RING_SPLIT_TAIL? -- justin
