> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:11 PM
> --On Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:07 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ap_hook_pre_config_ex() should work > > I'd be fine with a new hook in 2.0, but 2.1+ should just have pre_config > modified to always take that pool parameter. I don't see a need to keep cruft > around just for cruft's sake. > > If that sounds okay, I'll work up patches in the next few days - unless > someone wants to beat me to it. -- justin +1. I'm happy that this thread didn't go further in the direction of exposing the parent pool ;). Sander
