[moved from another list] * William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 12:56 PM 7/7/2003, Andr� Malo wrote: >>* Martin Kraemer wrote: >> >>> Is it really correct that there now is both a *.html and >>> a *.html.<lang> copy present, or is this a bug (here perhaps, >>> I have not looked deeper yet, or in the build)? >> >>That's correct. The pure *.html files contain type-maps (got a rid of >>multiviews). > > NOOOO!!!! > > Never use foo.html as a typemap descriptor! Please use foo.html.var > to describe the available variants. Why not? Extensions are totally irrelevant in HTTP universe. We've removed multiviews for efficiency reasons. And *.html are our stable URLs. nd
