* Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Andr� Malo wrote: > >> Hmm. After further thinking about it... I'm in favour of removing the >> check in 2.1. But I wouldn't backport it, since it *may* lead to a >> different behaviour of existing rules. > > I'm leaning on leaving it as-is for that same reason unless there's a > clear reason to change it...
The problem is, for example, that you cannot <!--#include virtual="rewritten-url" -->, since the subrequest won't be rewritten. (Sure, this affects .htaccess rules only, but a lot of people don't have the choice ...). nd
