On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Erik Abele wrote: > Just to prevent any misunderstandings: are we talking about a 2.2 > *alpha* or *beta* release here, or what will it be called? If it's in > any way marked as *unstable*, then a clear +1 from my side. The recent > changes are definitely worth to get tested in the wild, IMHO.
The alphas/betas will be called 2.1.x. 2.2.0 wouldn't be released until 2.1.x releases were declared stable. So, basically, yes.
