At 03:49 PM 9/18/2003, Wilt, Paul wrote: >Bill: > >Wasn't Jeff referring to the // single line comment in his message >about watching for language?
Yup - I thought he was merely dissing winsock :-) Another thought though, wouldn't that be more appropriate as a #error "This configuration cannot be compiled due to thread saftey bug in rfc1413.c" ??? Maybe the broken compilation bit wasn't a bad idea :-) Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:50 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES > > >At 02:28 PM 9/18/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Index: rfc1413.c >>> =================================================================== >>> + /* Win32 timeouts are in msec, represented as int */ >>> + msec = timeout * 1000; >>> + setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, + (char >*) &msec, sizeof(msec)); >>> + setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, + (char >*) &msec, sizeof(msec)); >>> +#else >>> + //XXX Needs to be implemented for non-winsock platforms >> >>watch your language > >:~P > >Question is - who else has threaded, non-winsock httpd-1.3 implementations? >Does OS2? I thought we had one other threaded unixish exception, but a very >quick grep for MULITTHREAD within src/os didn't reveal anything. > >Bill
