On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Ben Laurie wrote: > > For this one, it looks like we might need a way to keep track at a > > global scope what hooks there are. Right now, the only list of hooks is > > static to the file the hooks were declared in (a static struct called > > _hooks in that file). Or we could just only allow --list-hooks to list > > certain hooks which are known to the core a priori. > > I thought I had this in there already? Long time since I've looked, though.
As best I can tell (which isn't saying too much =), you can list the functions registered for a particular hook, but I can't find a way to get the names of ALL of the hooks in an entire system and then list all the registrants of each of them. > +1! They're already spaced apart somewhat, aren't they? Somewhat, yes: really_first == -10 first == 0 middle == 10 last == 20 really_last == 30 --Cliff
