--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:59 PM +0100 Andr� Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yeah, in concept I'd agree. (This function is was new for me :-)
But what about the cases where some vendor patches the patchlevel to name a
version like "2.0.48-1"? I'd try to be flexible enough to allow such cases.
So we should consider to leave out the is_dev part and introduce a add_string
part or the like. How does this sound?

+1. -- justin

Reply via email to