> -----Original Message----- > From: Andr� Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright > doesn't. And, in > > any case, the earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere. > > It was done for LICENSE 1.0 and 1.1 all the time for some > reason. But I don't know the american copyright rules that > well, so I don't really know the reason.... >
Me neither. Something like: This file is covered by the Apache 1.1 license see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE for details. Should be IMHO enough for IQ >= 90. Don't know if the lawyers fall in the range :-). MT.
