* Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fix to 2.1 and then proposing it for backport to a totally different > codebase somewhat blows my mind. > IMO the two should happen more or less in parallel...
If (and only if) you have three +1 for the 1.3 patch (i.e. just one more), then you can do it that way (RTC). I'm working similar. For fixes in different code bases I often provide more than one patch for review. I'd give a +1 (I *do* on concept) but I can't test currently, sorry. I bet, someone else certainly can. :) nd
