On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: > > > > > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > > > > > The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are: > > > > > > - BeOS specific MPM fixes > > > - Netware specific rand.c fixes > > > - Documentation update > > > - Berkeley DB detection fix on FreeBSD > > > > > > Furthermore the rc1 tarball was built using autoconf 2.57, while > > > 2.59 was used for rc2. > > > > > > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks, > > > > > > > Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1 > > Yeah, I wasn't expecting that to go away, since there weren't any > BSD fixes to this effect. Jeff asked you something in response > to your failures with rc1: > > """ > What got installed into /usr/libexec/apache by make install? Did the > DSOs get > installed with unexpected names? >
Oh that. We get the la 's installed and not the so's . apache 1.3.X does work acc BSD/OS . > Second, does 2.0.48 built in exactly the same way fail in a similar > manner? > """ > > Could you please provide us with an answer to that so we can try > and locate the cause of the problem? > > Thanks, > > Sander -- Member - Liberal International On 11 Sept 2001 the WORLD was violated. This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Society MUST be saved! Extremists must dissolve. Time to see the eternal relegation of Man U, Liverpool, Everton and Millwall
