On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Bill Stoddard wrote: > I took a 15 second look at the patch and have a concern (perhaps > unfounded). apr_file_seek() is probably an expensive operation. If > offset is 0, then in almost all cases (correct me if i'm wrong) the > fileptr will be at offset 0 as well, right? So your patch will result in > an expensive operation which is not needed most of the time. Is there a > different way to fix this?
I'll just point out that file_bucket_read() in apr-util does an unconditional apr_file_seek in the non-mmap case as well. I'm not aware of any way around having to do the seek. --Cliff
