On March 25, 2004 12:46 pm, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: > Now that we're discussing about shmcb, I had another question - I see > the following in shmcb.c > > 608 /* Work on the basis that you need 10 bytes index for each > session 609 * (approx 150 bytes), which is to divide temp by 160 > - and then 610 * make sure we err on having too index space to > burn even when 611 * the cache is full, which is a lot less > stupid than having 612 * having not enough index space to utilise > the whole cache!. */ 613 temp /= 120; > > > Is the comment on line 609 wrong OR is line 613 wrong ?
Neither. Line 610 is the reason, even if I wasn't able to rite my english proper like at a time the riting did. :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
