At 06:49 AM 3/29/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: >Ben Laurie wrote: >>Jeff Trawick wrote: > >>>solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all platforms >> >>Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a harmless change >>even if you don't consider it broken? > >a) agreed
Let me remind that although most platform compilers and linkers are agnostic to the retval, some may optimize in such a way that adding or eliminating a retval from an exported function declatation could break binary compatibility. I don't care either way - just being pedantic in the declaration. If we didn't toss out apr 0.9.5-final then this is a good place to throw it. Add an explicit test in th 2.0.x flavor of mod_unique_id to scream that apr 0.9.5 released or later 0.9 is required. Bill
