* Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 7. Elegance.
I tend to disagree. XML configuration is not elegant. Especially when you need to start quoting shell stuff and regexps for XML. XML configs are huge. This will blow up a typical 8k configuration file at least to 32k or more. XML is slow and less powerful compared to the current system. Anyway, I'm willing to get convinced when I see a new configuration system which (a) maps the current behaviour and complexities (b) does more than that and (c) make configuration of the httpd on a server system (no gui!) easier. Otherwise it's wasted time. Good luck! nd
