On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 15:01, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: > Sounds good. We should ponder a way to set up closed branches for > security patches. Maybe they could be protected on a case-by-case basis, > or we create a 4th top-level directory "security-patches".
Woo. I just wanted to point out how cool it is to be able to do selective access control on branches... something you just can't do in CVS. :-)
