On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:02:21AM -0400, Marc Heckmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:46:58PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > > > Thanks for testing this out Marc: unfortunately these patches break > > assumptions that various filters are making; applying them alone is > > likely to cause lots of random module segfaults. It's yet to be decided > > whether the patch is wrong or the modules are wrong... > > > > Do you know what "WinGet" does that's special, lots of ranged GET > > requests? > > yes I believe that is what it does. It basically hammers the httpd > with dozens of simultaneous requests to download a file in many > pieces. I'll see what I can do about reproducing this later on today.
Ah, I think you're seeing a different and less subtle problem here: the byterange filter in 2.0 will suck the entire CGI script output into memory too. :( joe
