* "Craig Woodford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These remarks are in reference to source code published at > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/request.html. > > switch (ap_satisfies(r)) { > case SATISFY_ALL: > case SATISFY_NOSPEC: > ... > > Seems to me the case for SATISFY_ALL does nothing useful. Is there a > missing break statement? If no, then why not comment out this case until > it includes code that actually does somethingl?
This code means that for satisfy_all and satisfy_nospec the same code is executed. Because there's no break statement, satisfy_all just falls through. > Feel free to tell me where to go, if you think that's appropriate. I'd suggest a good C book ;-) nd
