* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + f->ctx = ctx = (void*)-1;
I personally consider defining arbitrary pointer values as bad style, though I'm not sure what the general opinion here is (if any). I'd suggest to use a static pointer, like a global static char foo_sentinel; /* choose a speaking name ;-) */ /* and later */ f->ctx = ctx = &foo_sentinel; Additionally - afair - the use of arbirtrary pointer values can even lead to bus errors on not-so-usual systems (loading undefined bits into an address register...). nd -- die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker ] ;-) # André Malo, <http://www.perlig.de/> #
