--On Monday, August 2, 2004 2:54 PM -0400 Brian Akins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The other bottleneck I looked at was MD5 as the on-disk naming
scheme.  I think MD5 is a poor choice here because it's not very
fast.   Ideally, switching to a variant of the times-33 hash might
work out better. *shrug*


How to handle collisions?

MD5 has the possibility for collisions, too. What do squid or other proxies do? On one hand, I think doing MD5 is sort of silly - just use the URL itself. *shrug* -- justin

Reply via email to