André Malo wrote: > > OTOH hiding something just to 'boost' a new version is not fair. > > I think, you've got something wrong.
Perhaps :) > As of the branch to 2.1, > we've marked 2.0 stable and more or less freezed. That has > nothing to do with being fair or not. The development just > happens in 2.1 and beyond. Big changes to 2.0 are always > dangerous with regard to stability. (therefore RTC policy). > Dangerous? It works or it doesn’t. > Backporting all stuff from 2.1 to 2.0 doesn't do any good. > Of course, but if something works with 2.0, then it perhaps deserve a second look. It won't kill anyone :) Regards, MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
