At 11:53 AM 8/31/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Personally, I think that if Roy said that it would >> cause non-compliance then, unless he changed his mind, >> that's good enough for me to veto any change that >> would add Set-Cookie. > >I strongly agree. Roy?
As Roy just stated, cookies aren't in RFC 2616. Go ahead and apply this fix - I understand both perspectives; cookies as connection/session/auth data, and cookies as content metadata. The specification is really lacking in definition/. Bill
