I certainly understand the reason for this. however, I can't find any documentation in the RC that notes the separation or gives useful APR information - 2.0 was compile and go, while shipping 2.1 without APR is not.
Remember that 2.1 is not intended for general availability: it is by, our definition, only a development release.
I'd imagine, if we choose to separate apr and apr-util out (ambivalent on that), we'd have docs by the beginning of the 2.2 release cycle. -- justin
