On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:52:53 +0200, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:30:34 -0400, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>192.168.1.11 - - [03/Sep/2004:12:05:59 -0400] "GET > >>>>http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv HTTP/1.0" 404 236 > >>>> > >>>>error log has: > >>>> > >>>>[Fri Sep 03 12:05:59 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not > >>>>exist: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv > >> > > I had time dig into it enough to get the feeling that it is something > > that the balancer/worker folks ought to have a look at ;) It would be > > a big headstart knowing what is supposed to happen in the handler > > hook. See attached function call trace. Does the balancer's handler > > have to return OK? Does the balancer's proxy-pre_request hook have to > > return OK? > > Just committed the needed changes to allow forward proxies.
I saw... definitely gets farther now... This shows how far it gets when I configure mozilla to use Apache as HTTP proxy: [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] mod_proxy.c(654): Trying to run scheme_handler [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_http.c(1195): proxy: HTTP: serving URL http://planetsun.org/ [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1483): proxy: initialized worker for (*:0) min=0 max=25 smax=25 [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1414): proxy: socket is constructed [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1586): proxy: HTTP: has acquired connection for (*:0) [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1640): proxy: connecting http://planetsun.org/ to planetsun.org:80 [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1789): proxy: HTTP: fam 2 socket created to connect to *:0 [Thu Sep 09 06:53:16 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1880): proxy: HTTP: connection complete to 194.70.142.72:80 (planetsun.org) [Thu Sep 09 06:53:17 2004] [debug] proxy_http.c(1016): proxy: start body send [Thu Sep 09 06:53:17 2004] [crit] [Thu Sep 09 06:53:17 2004] file http_protocol.c, line 981, assertion "readbytes > 0" failed [Thu Sep 09 06:53:18 2004] [notice] child pid 4606 exit signal Abort (6), possible coredump in /export/home/trawick/inst/21 (gdb) where #0 0xd116200c in _lwp_kill () from /lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xd115f24d in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xd110c7af in raise () from /lib/libc.so.1 #3 0xd10eef34 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.1 #4 0x080cf256 in ap_log_assert (szExp=0x80fa235 "readbytes > 0", szFile=0x80fa0f0 "http_protocol.c", nLine=981) at log.c:708 #5 0x08091d86 in ap_http_filter (f=0x823dff8, b=0x8232e58, mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, block=APR_BLOCK_READ, readbytes=0) at http_protocol.c:981 #6 0x080da031 in ap_get_brigade (next=0x823dff8, bb=0x8232e58, mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, block=APR_BLOCK_READ, readbytes=0) at util_filter.c:474 #7 0x080e3c46 in net_time_filter (f=0x8233e30, b=0x8232e58, mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, block=APR_BLOCK_READ, readbytes=0) at core.c:3768 #8 0x080da031 in ap_get_brigade (next=0x8233e30, bb=0x8232e58, mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, block=APR_BLOCK_READ, readbytes=0) at util_filter.c:474 #9 0x0808d4e9 in ap_proxy_http_process_response (p=0x8231f78, r=0x8237fc8, backend=0x81e7e30, origin=0x82326b8, conf=0x8180598, server_portstr=0xcf66dd20 ":8080") at proxy_http.c:1027 #10 0x0808da6f in ap_proxy_http_handler (r=0x8237fc8, worker=0x8186490, conf=0x8180598, url=0x8232658 "/", proxyname=0x0, proxyport=0) at proxy_http.c:1254 #11 0x080828cf in proxy_run_scheme_handler (r=0x8237fc8, worker=0x8186490, conf=0x8180598, url=0x8239216 "http://planetsun.org/";, proxyhost=0x0, proxyport=0) at mod_proxy.c:1749 #12 0x08080419 in proxy_handler (r=0x8237fc8) at mod_proxy.c:656 #13 0x080cabb5 in ap_run_handler (r=0x8237fc8) at config.c:156 #14 0x080cb312 in ap_invoke_handler (r=0x8237fc8) at config.c:368 #15 0x08095864 in ap_process_request (r=0x8237fc8) at http_request.c:246 #16 0x0808fb2e in ap_process_http_connection (c=0x82320a0) at http_core.c:253 #17 0x080d719a in ap_run_process_connection (c=0x82320a0) at connection.c:42 #18 0x080d7586 in ap_process_connection (c=0x82320a0, csd=0x8231fb0) at connection.c:175 #19 0x080c7305 in process_socket (p=0x8231f78, sock=0x8231fb0, my_child_num=1, my_thread_num=24, bucket_alloc=0x8235f88) at worker.c:520 #20 0x080c7a96 in worker_thread (thd=0x81e4418, dummy=0x817e650) at worker.c:856 > > Q: > Is it possible to have forward and reverse proxies mixed together > on the same box? definitely
