On 15 Sep 2004 23:45:19 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mccreedy 2004/09/15 16:45:18
>
> src/modules/proxy mod_proxy.h
> Index: mod_proxy.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.62
> retrieving revision 1.63
> diff -u -r1.62 -r1.63
> --- mod_proxy.h 17 Feb 2004 21:52:22 -0000 1.62
> +++ mod_proxy.h 15 Sep 2004 23:45:18 -0000 1.63
> @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@
>
> struct per_thread_data {
> struct hostent hpbuf;
> +#ifdef TPF
> + u_int ipaddr;
> +#else
> u_long ipaddr;
> +#endif
> char *charpbuf[2];
> };
64-bit fix for TPF? looks like u_long is a hold-over from the very
old days and we should use in_addr_t wherever it exists, and define
in_addr_t appropriately on other platforms
