|
Oups!, sorry I was few minutes slower than you Greg.
The overall patch looks good and much cleaner.
I would love to move my office next to both of you...
I will put the new code on my mp box and make sure
It does not break.
Thanks,
JJ
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/16/04 9:50 AM >>> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> - /* If obj->complete is not set, the cache update failed and the > - * object needs to be removed from the cache then cleaned up. > - */ > - if (!obj->complete) { > - if (sconf->lock) { > - apr_thread_mutex_lock(sconf->lock); > - } > - /* Remember, objects marked for cleanup are, by design, already > - * removed from the cache. remove_url() could have already > - * removed the object from the cache (and set obj->cleanup) > - */ > - if (!obj->cleanup) { > - cache_remove(sconf->cache_cache, obj); > - obj->cleanup = 1; > - } > - if (sconf->lock) { > - apr_thread_mutex_unlock(sconf->lock); > - } > - } > - I don't understand why the equivalent of this section is no longer needed. Was this dead code before? Greg |
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_mem_ca... Jean-Jacques Clar
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_m... Bill Stoddard
- [PATCH - update ] Re: Seg fault: race condition... Bill Stoddard
