On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:20:02 -0400, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:39:04 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we quickly identify what else was broken to roll out 2.0.52 > > in the next day or two? I presume this too was 2.0.51 specific? > > it is my understanding that the mod_mem_cache double-free was a > regression introduced in 2.0.51
oops, FirstBill tells me that the mod_mem_cache double-free was an old problem... I guess I don't get a free subscription to the commit list
