At 08:29 AM 9/22/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >I'm prepared to reroll the Win32 installers this week for 2.0.52 - the >only question is, what other regressions did 2.0.51 introduce? May as >well fix all the newly introduced bugs and roll out 2.0.52 in the next >day or two.
Based on the positive reception, I'm going to lay down a candidate tag at 1900 GMT tomorrow (about 23 hours from now.) Some commented they wanted 2.0.51 + exactly this, that, the other patch. I don't believe that's necessarily right; if we are being conservative with the code applied to the 2_0 branch, and those apr people are conservative with their 0_9 branch, there should be no problem with starting a testing cycle tomorrow. Please don't treat this as a green light to cram in tons o' patches by my arbitrary tag time, but if there is a patch safely ready to be backported, by all means do. I plan to catch everything in the 2_0 branch up to that time, and throw out a tarball for review. Bill
