On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 15:00 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > Is there any interest in this patch? Eventually it might > > even be nice to extend the concept to keepalives, but I suppose > > that would mean introducing some state management into > > ap_process_connection. > > > > FWIW, I am definitely interested (especially if we can get confirmation of the > results on several different > platforms from several different folks). greg ames and i have a patch that > essentially does this for > keep-alives, it's been posted to the dev@ list in the recent past. No time to work > on it myself tho, sorry. >
Yes, I am interested too. I have taken Greg's patch and turned it into a Full 'event' MPM. I am currently re-working some of apr_pollset_* so I can avoid all locking when adding or removing FDs to a pollset. Once I have the patch to APR done, I planned on submitting the event MPM to be included in CVS. -Paul Querna
