On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Probably not worth it given all of the parallel development. > > > > Well, I'd rather see us using something like this: > > > > httpd/ > > apreq/ > > trunk/ > > branches/ > > tags/ > > +1, with more details: httpd-apreq current cvs should > probably go to > > apreq/branches/1.3 > > and httpd-apreq-2 cvs can go to apreq/trunk.
*nod* > Also, will > the apreq commit emails still be sent to apreq-cvs@, or > will every commit to the httpd repository have to go to > a common commit list? We can configure the mailer however we like (within boundaries of reason ofcourse :). Sander
