On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:12:57PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, October 7, 2004 12:13 PM -0600 Jean-Jacques Clar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I won't probably agree if we use 'Waboozle', and I suggest that the
> >description
> >should with the name of the module like MemCache* and DiskCache* to
> >make it easier for related directives to be grouped together (sorted).
>
> I'd really prefer for all caching directives to be under Cache* so that the
> alphabetical ordering of the directives that we generate in our docs group
> them together. Using MemCache* and DiskCache* instead of CacheMem* and
> CacheDisk* sort of blow that away.
+1 directives should be grouped into module namespace prefixes
whenever possible
Not only will things sort together in web pages, but this is more
intuitive for many non-English speakers since many languages put
the adjectives after the noun, i.e. the subdescription after the
description.
Cheers,
Glenn
