On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:50:19AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, October 8, 2004 3:59 PM +0100 Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >zutil.h isn't really needed at all; in fact whole the gzip header could > >be in an immortal bucket, much less overhead than jumping through the > >psprintf code. Try this? > > I think we tried to hard-code OS_CODE to 0x03 initially and ran into some > type of portability problem. That's why we were trying to set it > 'correctly.' Either way, it could still be an immortal bucket - that part > of your change is probably goodness.
I guess I can see there would have been problems from assuming zutil.h exists and OS_CODE was defined, hence the current code, but it's hard to imagine there are portability problems from just not using the things at all... > > Jean-Frederic's problem just appears to be a warning because his install is > corrupt somehow. It looks like he has conflicting zlib installations - so > I'd also expect the linker to get confused as well. -- justin It's apparently an issue when you have zlib 1.2.1 installed somewhere, since in that version zutil.h is considered an "internal" header and is not installed by make install: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28673 so that's a good motivation for not using it too. joe
