--On Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:56 PM -0400 Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I'm thinking that we should see MODE_EATCRLF behave differently when core_input_filter has data stashed.
I would prefer a more general solution. As I hinted at before, couldn't AP_MODE_SPECULATIVE with APR_NONBLOCK_READ suffice? -- justin
It might work fine, but we already have a MODE_EATCRLF call which ought to do the job (down to the core_input_filter anyway) as long as we remember what it returned. Are you suggesting that we replace that? Would that solve some data-stashed-in-connection-filter cases?
Greg
