Brad Nicholes wrote: > > I like the suggestion as well because I think that would be the right > way to implement complex LDAP expressions. But it would probably take > adding at least a new util_ldap_filter_search() API to Util_ldap() in > order to accomodate this functionality. The advantage of also having an > ldap-attribute directive is because if simplicity as well as > performance. According to the LDAP docs, doing an ldap_compare_s() is > faster than an ldap_search_s(). I will go ahead an commit the patch > as-is and also propose a backport for it. But I think that we should > look at adding a "require ldap-filter" directive as well for Apache > 2.1/2.2. >
+1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
