William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:29 PM 11/24/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'm sick of all talk and no action. We tried this last year when we were
"almost" ready to branch APR 1.0 and all action on that front ceased
entirely for a YEAR. This time it's one or the other. I'll wait 24 hours
at most to hear opinions. Whichever route gets the most support wins.
So far we have:
trunk remains 1.1, 64-bit is sandboxed:
jwoolley, jerenkrantz
wrowe: (conditional on committing to head once it's reviewed,
and branch 1.1 if we want to keep 1.1 alive.)
That is fine by me. I agree that the extent of the
changes will probably be significant so at least starting
with a sandbox branch may be judicious, at least until we
get a feel for the extent of the changes, and working on
a branch may actually help accelerate the work.
Allan
