* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Friday, November 26, 2004 12:05 AM +0000 Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Actually aclocal belongs to automake.
>
> Correct.
>
> > But then, it would be a weird system where autoconf/automake/libtool are
> > not installed as a group, so I guess that's still ok.
oops. (Who the hell named that tool aclocal?!)
> No, it's not. I purposely don't install automake.
I'd be really interested in the reasons.
> -1 as we can't (won't) make httpd depend on automake.
Just to be fair, we would make developers depend on automake, not httpd.
> Please find some other way to address this problem. -- justin
I'd guess, something like apr-util/xml/expat/buildconf.sh does? As you refuse
to install aclocal, it could be your favorite task >:->
nd
--
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
-- aus einer Rezension
<http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
