* Brian Pane wrote: > Okay, I checked out the patch attached to that bug. Supporting the use > of an external copy of PCRE makes sense.
+1 on concept. > The patch also changes various > core PCRE function names to ap_*. That definitely helps prevent > collisions with libc or libpthread versions of the regex functions on > some platforms, but changing the PCRE function names may be > controversial... would any other committers care to chime in with their > thoughts on this? I'm wondering if there isn't a better solution for this. But if we'd need to change the names, I think we should do this more centralized, i.e. a header file, which contains some defines and is included in proper files. This would keep the patches against the upstream more clear. Shouldn't that work? > Meanwhile, now that we have the latest release of PCRE in httpd-2.1, one > option would help somewhat would be to backport it into httpd-2.0. I'm -1 on backporting PCRE 5.0 to 2.0. nd -- Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook.
