On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:41:58 +0000, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > [snip] > > Alternatively one could use a manager thread that implements > > something like a thread-specific alarm(), where a signal handler > > running on the interrupted thread does siglongjmp() to break out of > > the interrupted processing, but implementing that sort of service is > > not trivial. > > Is it actually worth mentioning that? It seems to invite people who > don't really know what they're doing around threads to get in too deep. > I would imagine that anyone who's competent to do that would have > already got the message from the previous text :)
Agreed, not something we want to mention in the docs. It begs more and more details which would not be forthcoming ;)
