-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
For some reason I bounced enough email to get booted off of the list. Bah.
Anyways, I was looking at Rici's proposal, and I think I really like it.
It seems more to match the way that people think about vhosts, and it
seems to be in the spirit of what the NameVirtualHost directive tries to
mean now. Seems like this would be easier to explain to people.
Of course, lots of folks are going to want their existing configuration
to keep working, which could be a bit of a pain. Although probably
nothing that a few Perl scripts couldn't solve.
- --
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
Dog Years (Rush - Test for Echo - 1999)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBvweyXP03+sx4yJMRAsMQAJ9SDT/W37xJCc0d2IJ6kmbfC6YjWgCeLST1
zSqCe1fzi5xcs+Ti/MVNlAI=
=bVEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
