Hi, On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:54:05 +0100, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:47:48 +0100, Jan Kratochvil > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > An interesting issue is that what is in 2.0 now is optimal when it > works, and it works in a common real-world scenario (client sends C-L > and no filters modify the request body size).
Sorry for chatting without code sample etc. * If no active filters are detected after headers parsing pass the single request unchanged through this connection by its C-L despite its possible "keepalive". * Use currently 2.1-implemented C-E "chunked" as fallback. Will there really remain no active filters in the common case? At least ap_byterange_filter() gives up but chunk_filter() never does. Is it possible to patch such filters? It would be performance wise. :-) Regards, Lace
