William A. Rowe, Jr. said: > Incident http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31443 > offers a solution which we should consider adopting. As I was > asking for some offline feedback - Graham mentioned that some > implementations use the URL to specify that STARTTLS is desired. > But without some references the proposal seems to be a better > option - we shouldn't be redefining the ldap:// URI space.
Doing some Googling, it seems that an out of url directive seems to be the way everyone else is handling it. Let me look at this patch - it will probably need some reworking to fit in with the binary compatibility requirements of APR, but I need an LDAP enabled release of APR in the next few days, so there is an urgency to finish this off :) Regards, Graham --
